PRAKTIK AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA PADA DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERHUBUNGAN UDARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/dinamika.v6i1.1093Keywords:
performance accountability, LAKIP, public sector performance, air transportationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of performance accountability at the Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara (DJPU) ) of the Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia based on the 2023 Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP). Performance accountability is a key instrument for assessing public sector organizations’ ability to account for the achievement of strategic objectives and public service quality. This research employs a qualitative approach using a documentary study method. The primary data source is the 2023 LAKIP of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation obtained from the official institutional website. Data were analyzed using content analysis to examine the alignment between performance targets and achievements as well as reported accountability practices. The results indicate that the overall performance of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation in 2023 was categorized as very good, with an average performance achievement of 101.82 percent. Aviation safety and security indicators showed very high achievement, while public service quality was reflected in the user satisfaction index and on time performance exceeding the targets. However, the air transportation connectivity ratio did not fully meet the target, indicating structural and operational challenges. The study concludes that performance accountability at the Directorate General of Civil Aviation has been implemented effectively, although continuous improvement is required, particularly in enhancing air transportation connectivity.
References
[1] W. Wilson, The Study of Administration, vol. 2, no. 2. The Academy of Political Science, 1887. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277?origin=JSTOR-pdf
[2] M. Weber, The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster, 2009.
[3] H. A. Simon, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. in Free Press paperback. Free Press, 1976. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IRdPAAAAMAAJ
[4] R. K. Merton, Social theory and social structure, Rev. ed. New York, NY, US: Free Press, 1957. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1959-00989-000
[5] R. K. Merton, “Bureaucratic structure and personality,” Complex Organ. A Sociol. Read., pp. 47–59, 1961.
[6] F. J. Goodnow, Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. Macmillan, 1900. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NVoPAAAAYAAJ
[7] C. Hood, “A public management for all seasons?,” Public Adm., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 1991.
[8] D. Osborne, Reinventing government. JSTOR, 1993.
[9] E. Ferlie, The New Public Management in Action. Oxford University Press, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=D_5ve9q1B2cC
[10] R. B. Denhardt and J. V. Denhardt, “The new public service: Serving rather than steering,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 549–559, 2000.
[11] J. V Denhardt and R. B. Denhardt, The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge, 2015.
[12] M. Bovens, “Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1,” Eur. law J., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 447–468, 2007.
[13] M. A. P. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, The Oxford handbook public accountability. Oxford handbooks, 2014.
[14] R. D. Behn, Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eRiMDwAAQBAJ
[15] M. Dubnick and B. Romzek, “"Accountability in public administration.”,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 47, pp. 227–238, 1987.
[16] A. Sinclair, “The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 20, no. 2–3, pp. 219–237, 1995.
[17] B. G. Peters, “The Politics of Bureaucracy: A Continuing Saga,” NISPAcee J. Public Adm. Policy, vol. 13, pp. 213–220, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.2478/nispa-2020-0021.
[18] C. Pollitt and G. Bouckaert, Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press, 2017.
[19] J. G. S. Koppell, “Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of ‘multiple accountabilities disorder,’” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 94–108, 2005.
[20] G. Bouckaert and J. Halligan, Managing Performance: International Comparisons. Taylor & Francis, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=kBl2G6IE1WEC
[21] D. P. Moynihan, The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. in Public Management and Change series. Georgetown University Press, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4-YZW-duoZ8C
[22] M. Andrews, The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[23] W. Van Dooren, G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan, Performance management in the public sector. Routledge, 2015.
[24] D. Moynihan and S. Kroll, “Performance management routines,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 76, pp. 531–542, 2016.
[25] M. Bovens, T. Schillemans, and P. Hart, “Does public accountability work? An assessment tool,” Public Adm., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 225–242, 2008.
[26] M. Lodge and K. Wegrich, The Problem-solving Capacity of the Modern State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. in Hertie School governance report series. Oxford University Press, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zai1BAAAQBAJ
[27] T. Schillemans and M. Bovens, “The evaluation of public accountability,” Public Adm., vol. 95, pp. 417–435, 2017.
[28] . Schillemans and T. Busuioc, “Predicting public sector accountability,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 82, pp. 115–128, 2022.
[29] M. Lodge and K. Wegrich, “Public governance and performance,” Governance, vol. 36, pp. 1–15, 2023.
[30] C. Ansell and J. Torfing, Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. 2014. doi: 10.4324/9780203795958.
[31] R. Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik,” 2009.
[32] P. P. Indonesia, “Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah,” Jakarta, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/41515/perpres-no-29-tahun-2014
[33] K. PANRB, “Evaluasi SAKIP, RB, dan ZI 2023, Menteri PANRB: Hasilnya Harus Berdampak,” KemenPANRB, Jakarta, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/evaluasi-sakip-rb-zi-2023-menteri-panrb-hasilnya-harus-berdampak
[34] LAN and BPKP, “Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance; Modul 1 dari 5 Modul Sosialisasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemeintah (AKIP),” Lembaga Administrasi Negara : Jakarta.
[35] Mardiasmo, AKUNTANSI SEKTOR PUBLIK - Edisi Terbaru. Andi Offset, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pBVCEAAAQBAJ
[36] Mahmudi, Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://opac.ut.ac.id/detail-opac?id=41858
[37] Dwiyanto, Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. UGM PRESS, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=vTMXEAAAQBAJ
[38] J. Widodo, Good governance: telaah dari dimensi akuntabilitas dan kontrol birokrasi pada era desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah. Insan Cendekia, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=yM6NAAAAMAAJ
[39] ICAO, “Safety Management Manual,” jakarta, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/sp-files/safety/Documents/ICAO_SR_2018_30082018.pdf
[40] ICAO, “Global Aviation Safety Plan,” 2020.
[41] B. G. Peters, What Is Governance? London: Polity Press, 2019.
[42] B. Romzek, J. LeRoux, and J. Blackmar, “A comparative perspective on accountability,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 71, pp. 605–616, 2011.
[43] Haryanto and Riyadi, “Implementasi SAKIP di Indonesia,” J. Adm. Publik, vol. 19, pp. 45–60, 2024.
[44] Pratama and Sutopo, “Evaluasi kinerja instansi pemerintah,” J. Manaj. Publik, vol. 10, pp. 88–102, 2022.
[45] Sofyani, Akbar, and Ferrer, “Performance accountability in Indonesia,” J. Public Budg., vol. 34, pp. 1–15, 2021.
[46] Widodo, “Budaya organisasi dan kinerja publik,” J. Ilmu Adm., vol. 18, pp. 77–91, 2022.
[47] OECD, “Government at a Glance 2021,” 2021.
[48] OECD, “Government at a Glance 2023,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en
[49] Moynihan and S. Pandey, “Learning from performance information,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 83, pp. 234–245, 2023.
[50] Busuioc and M. Lodge, “Reputation and accountability,” Governance, vol. 36, pp. 789–803, 2023.
[51] W. Bank, Public Sector Performance. Washington DC: World Bank, 2022.
[52] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gX1ZDwAAQBAJ
[53] N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage, 2011.
[54] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=uX1ZDwAAQBAJ
[55] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FjBw2oi8El4C
[56] A. Giddens, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press, 1984.
[57] R. A. W. Rhodes, Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University, 1997.
[58] W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations. in Foundations for Organizational Science. SAGE Publications, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=kpDUHoaNhqYC
[59] J. G. March and J. P. Olsen, Rediscovering institutions. Simon and Schuster, 2010.
[60] J. Pierre and B. Peters, Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7H5aCwAAQBAJ
[61] P. Lægreid and T. Christensen, The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe. 2016.
[62] M. Andrews, L. Pritchett, and M. J. V Woolcock, Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford University Press, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=YGXODQAAQBAJ
[63] M. Lodge and K. Wegrich, Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-7605203-658381c03d.pdf
[64] B. G. Peters, Institutional Theory in Political Science, Fourth Edition: The New Institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=qY6ODwAAQBAJ
[65] J. Halligan, Performance Management and Accountability. London: Routledge, 2020.
[66] UNDP, “Public Accountability Framework,” New York: UNDP, 2020.
[67] OECD, “Performance Budgeting in the Public Sector,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
[68] W. Bank, “Public Financial Management Reform,” Washington DC: World Bank, 2021.
[69] A. D. Bank, “Public Sector Management Review,” Manila: ADB, 2021.
[70] E. Commission, “Public Accountability Mechanisms,” Brussels: EC, 2022.
[71] K. P. RI, “Rencana Strategis Kementerian Perhubungan 2020–2024,” Jakarta: Kemenhub.
[72] K. P. RI, “Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Perhubungan,” Jakarta: Kemenhub.
[73] D. J. P. Udara, “Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Tahun 2023,” Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hubud.kemenhub.go.id/hubud/website/assets/file/lakip/LAKIP_2023.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bernadus Satya Graha, Dewi Casmiwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
