Memahami Contextual Performance Sebagai Sikap Kerja Positif
Abstract
In the development of industries and organizations in Indonesia, there is one important variable, namely contextual performance. Contextual performance is one of the important variables because it can produce a positive work environment for industry and organizations. Although contextual performance is not considered as part of the main task (non-formal) by the performance system, contextual performance contributes more to maintaining the social system in the organizational environment as a positive work attitude. The method used in this journal is literature review research, which is collecting research journals and books based on the issues raised to provide a new, detailed description of the contextual performance issues. the result is that this work attitude does not show the results of the impact immediately, but will be seen in the long term. This scientific article focuses on providing an understanding of contextual performance by using the literature study method
References
Ariani, D. W. (2010). Hubungan Kinerja Tugas dan Kinerja Kontekstual Dengan Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen dan Kepribadian.
Asiedu-Appiah, F., & Addai, H. (2014). An Investigation into The Causal Relationship Between Employees'locus of Control And Contextual Performance. ASBBS Proceedings, 21(1), 40.
Branscombe N. A., and Robert A. Baron. 2017. Social Psychology Fourteenth Edition. Pearson: England.
Dåderman, A. M., Ingelgård, A., & Koopmans, L. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation, from Dutch to Swedish language, of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Work, 65(1), 97-109.
Delgado-Rodríguez, N., Hernández-Fernaud, E., Rosales, C., Díaz-Vilela, L., Isla-Díaz, R., & Díaz-Cabrera, D. (2018). Contextual performance in academic settings: the role of personality, self-efficacy, and impression management. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 63-68.
Díaz-Vilela, L. F., Rodríguez, N. D., Isla-Díaz, R., Díaz-Cabrera, D., Hernández-Fernaud, E., & Rosales-Sánchez, C. (2015). Relationships between contextual and task performance and interrater agreement: Are there any?. PloS one, 10(10), e0139898.
Guo, Y., & Ling, B. (2020). Effects of leader motivating language on employee task and contextual performance: The mediating role of feedback quality. Psychological reports, 123(6), 2501-2518.
Lee, Y. H., Yang, L. S., Wan, K. M., & Chen, G. H. (2010). Interactive effects of personality and friendship networks on contextual performance. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 38(2), 197-208.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4), 475.
Palenzuela, P., Delgado, N., & Rodriguez, J. A. (2019). Exploring the relationship between contextual performance and burnout in healthcare professionals. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(2), 115-121.
Pradhan, S., & Pradhan, R. K. (2015). An empirical investigation of relationship among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment and contextual performance. Vision, 19(3), 227-235.
Reilly, R. R., & Aronson, Z. H. (2009). Managing contextual performance. Performance management: Putting research into action, 297-328.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of applied psychology, 81(5), 525.
Yu, V. S. O., & Wang, Y. (2018). The Influence of Organization Culture on Middle-Level Managers'contextual Performance with Commitment as a Mediating Variable. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business, 18(2), 58-71.
