BUMDES DAN KOPERASI DESA DALAM TRANSFORMASI EKONOMI PERDESAAN: KOMPLEMENTARITAS KELEMBAGAAN DAN TATA KELOLA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/dinamika.v6i2.1469Keywords:
rural economic transformation;, governance, BUMDes;, Village CooperativesAbstract
Rural economic transformation in Indonesia involves BUMDes and Village Cooperatives as key economic institutions. This study examines their institutional relationship, focusing on complementarity, potential overlap, and governance. Using a qualitative approach, the study analyzes regulations, academic literature, and policy documents through thematic analysis. The findings indicate that although BUMDes and Village Cooperatives have distinct institutional characteristics, they share economic spaces that require coordination. Clear role division, transparency, accountability, and community participation are essential. Effective institutional coordination can strengthen sustainable rural.
References
[1] I. Scoones, “Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis,” Institute of Development Studies, 1998.
[2] S. Fitriyanti, “Analisis potensi pembentukan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) berbasis kearifan lokal di Desa Hiyung Kabupaten Tapin,” J. Kebijak. Pembang., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2019.
[3] H. A. Pradana and S. Fitriyanti, “Pemberdayaan dan percepatan perkembangan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) dalam peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat dan peningkatan pendapatan asli desa,” J. Kebijak. Pembang., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133–146, 2019.
[4] B. Arifin et al., “Village fund, village-owned-enterprises, and employment: Evidence from Indonesia,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 79, pp. 382–394, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.052.
[5] I. Kania, G. Anggadwita, and D. T. Alamanda, “A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia,” J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 432–450, 2021, doi: 10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0137.
[6] E. Ostrom, Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, 2005. doi: 10.1515/9781400831739.
[7] E. Ostrom, “Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 641–672, 2010, doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
[8] H. Antlöv, A. Wetterberg, and L. Dharmawan, “Village governance, community life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia,” Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 161–183, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047.
[9] N. A. Herdianti, Y. Darusman, and A. Hamdan, “Pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) dalam meningkatkan pendapatan keluarga,” J. Kebijak. Pembang., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2026, doi: 10.47441/jkp.v21i1.470.
[10] A. I. Al-Ma’ruf, Z. Arifin, and F. Nugrahani, “Exploring ethical frontiers: Moral dimensions in the tapestry of contemporary Indonesian literature,” Stud. English Lang. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 587–604, 2024, doi: 10.24815/siele.v11i1.35142.
[11] T. Ultari and Khoirunurrofik, “The role of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in village development: Empirical evidence from villages in Indonesia,” J. Perenc. Pembang. Indones. J. Dev. Plan., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 256–280, 2024, doi: 10.36574/jpp.v8i2.559.
[12] D. C. North, Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[13] P. A. Hall and D. Soskice, Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, 2001. doi: 10.1093/0199247757.001.0001.
[14] S. Hadi, A. Marta, R. M. Amin, and R. Febrina, “Rural development in community empowerment through the governance of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes),” Nakhoda J. Ilmu Pemerintah., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 121–134, 2024, doi: 10.35967/njip.v23i1.702.
[15] E. Eprianti and I. U. Choiriyah, “Governance of Village-Owned Enterprises in promoting economic growth: Tata kelola BUMDes dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi,” Indones. J. Cult. Community Dev., vol. 15, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.21070/ijccd.v16i1.1144.
[16] A. Bebbington, “Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty,” World Dev., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2021–2044, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7.
[17] G. A. Bowen, “Document analysis as a qualitative research method,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, 2009.
[18] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.
[19] S. Harahap and Andriansyah, “Implementasi kebijakan pembentukan Koperasi Desa/Kelurahan Merah Putih dan implikasinya terhadap keberadaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes),” J. Ilm. Adm. Publik dan Pemerintah., vol. 5, no. 2, 2026, doi: https://jurnalmahasiswa.uma.ac.id/index.php/jiapp/article/view/7320.
[20] J. Kameo, Y. A. K. Noegroho, T. Wahyono, S. Setjoatmadja, and F. R. Arndarnijaria, “Model hukum campur tangan negara melalui pendanaan pemerintah dalam transformasi digital dan pengelolaan berkelanjutan Koperasi Desa/Kelurahan Merah Putih,” J. Bina Praja, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121–137, 2026, doi: 10.21787/jbp.18.2026.3016.
[21] L. Judijanto, “From competition to co-opetition: Building synergy between Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) and Koperasi Desa Merah Putih (KDMP) for holistic rural welfare in Indonesia,” Glob. J. Econ. Financ. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 281–297, 2026, doi: 10.55677/GJEFR/05-2026-Vol03E5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ade Isyana Hairunnisah, Wahyudi Maherza, Pangondian Harahap
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
