THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF AI-DRIVEN DECISION-MAKING IN BUSINESS: A MULTI-PERSPECTIVE CASE STUDY ON CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/z0b0ep50Keywords:
AI, etika bisnis, transparansi, bias algoritmik, akuntabilitasAbstract
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in business decision-making has significantly impacted operational efficiency and effectiveness. However, ethical challenges such as algorithm transparency, AI system bias, and ethical policy accountability remain major concerns. This study aims to examine how companies manage ethical dilemmas in AI implementation through a multi-perspective case study of three companies in the financial, e-commerce, and technology sectors. The findings reveal that algorithmic transparency remains limited, AI bias has the potential to create unfairness, and ethical accountability implementation varies across companies. Some companies have adopted explainable AI (XAI) and algorithmic audits as mitigation strategies, while others still rely on internal guidelines without strict oversight mechanisms. This study provides insights into the need for stricter regulations, the importance of regular algorithmic audits, and the encouragement of more transparent and accountable AI adoption in the business world.
References
Almasarwah, A., Wreikat, A. Al, Marei, Y., & Alsharari, N. (2024). AI’s influence on corporate transparency and financial performance: a new era. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 7(3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAF.2024.143833
Busuioc, M. (2021). Accountable Artificial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.13293
Desma, S. (2025). Local Culture-Based Marketing Strategy: A Study of Companies in the Archipelago. TechTalent & Business Review, 1(1), 16–22. https://jurnal-nusantara.bangangga.com/index.php/TTBR/article/view/16
Du, S., & Xie, C. (2021). Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 129, 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.08.024
Edith Ebele Agu, Angela Omozele Abhulimen, Anwuli Nkemchor Obiki-Osafiele, Olajide Soji Osundare, Ibrahim Adedeji Adeniran, & Christianah Pelumi Efunniyi. (2024). Discussing ethical considerations and solutions for ensuring fairness in AI-driven financial services. International Journal of Frontline Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 001–009. https://doi.org/10.56355/ijfrms.2024.3.2.0024
Emma, L. (2024). The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence: A Deep Dive into Bias, Fairness, and Transparency. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386045670
Hanna, M. G., Pantanowitz, L., Jackson, B., Palmer, O., Visweswaran, S., Pantanowitz, J., Deebajah, M., & Rashidi, H. H. (2025). Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning. Modern Pathology, 38(3), 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MODPAT.2024.100686
Hoerber, T., Weber, G., Cabras, I., & Ulnicane, I. (2017). Chapter 14 Artificial intelligence in the European Union. The Routledge Handbook of European Integrations, 254–269. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262081-19
Houser, K. A. (2019). Can AI Solve the Diversity Problem in the Tech Industry: Mitigating Noise and Bias in Employment Decision-Making. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stantlr22&id=291&div=&collection=
Lee, J. (2020). Access to Finance for Artificial Intelligence Regulation in the Financial Services Industry. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 731–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40804-020-00200-0/METRICS
Marwala, T. (2024). Self-regulation Versus Government Regulation. The Balancing Problem in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9251-1_13
Mujtaba, D. F., & Mahapatra, N. R. (2024). Fairness in AI-Driven Recruitment: Challenges, Metrics, Methods, and Future Directions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19699v2
Munoko, I., Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2020). The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04407-1/TABLES/6
Pascale, J., Lineback, J. F., Bates, N., & Beatty, P. (2022). Protecting the Identity of Participants in Qualitative Research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(3), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/JSSAM/SMAB048
Rana, S. C., Francis, U., Zavi, L., Ella, S., Honein-Abou Haidar, G., & Peter, D. (2023). Cultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysis. Heliyon, 9(4), 2405–8440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14904
Rodgers, W., Al-Shaikh, S., & Khalil, M. (2024). Protocol Analysis Data Collection Technique Implemented for Artificial Intelligence Design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6842–6853. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3269291
Rodgers, W., Murray, J. M., Stefanidis, A., Degbey, W. Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2023). An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HRMR.2022.100925
Santos, K. da S., Ribeiro, M. C., de Queiroga, D. E. U., da Silva, I. A. P., & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764
Tambari Faith Nuka, & Amos Abidemi Ogunola. (2024). AI and machine learning as tools for financial inclusion: challenges and opportunities in credit scoring. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(2), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2258
Tanaka, H., & Nakamura, Y. (2024). Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Driven Decision-Making Processes. Digital Transformation and Administration Innovation, 2(2), 17–23. https://journaldtai.com/index.php/jdtai/article/view/13
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dinamika: Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.