PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK, DESAIN PRODUK, DAN GAYA HIDUP TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PONSEL IPHONE PADA GENERASI MUDA DI KECAMATAN GAJAH, DEMAK

Authors

  • Dwi Ana Farida Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Studi Ekonomi Modern
  • Heni Susilowati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Studi Ekonomi Modern

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/b1e8v118

Keywords:

Brand Equity, Product Design, Lifestyle, Purchasing Decision, iPhone

Abstract

In today's digital era, smartphones have become a symbol of social identity, especially among the younger generation. One interesting phenomenon is the high interest of the younger generation in the iPhone, which is considered an element of a modern lifestyle. This study aims to examine the impact of brand equity, product design, and lifestyle on iPhone purchasing decisions among the younger generation living in Gajah District, Demak. A total of 60 respondents selected using purposive sampling techniques became the sample in this study. Data were collected through questionnaires, and data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 30. The analysis tests applied included instrument tests, classical assumption tests, as well as hypothesis tests and R tests. The results of the study showed that brand equity, product design, and lifestyle have a positive and significant influence on iPhone purchasing decisions among the younger generation in Gajah District, Demak. Companies need to strengthen their brand image, innovate in product design, and adjust their marketing strategies to the dynamic lifestyles of young consumers.

References

F. Fauzan, “ Indonesia Peringkat 4 Pengguna Ponsel Terbanyak di Dunia,” Kompas.com.

D. Szabó and E. Dani, “Smartphones and social media as status symbol of Gen Z,” Folia Toruniensia, vol. 22, pp. 87–111, 2022, doi: 10.12775/FT.2022.005.

L. Marlina and S. Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bima, “PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK ( BRAND EQUITY ) TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SMARTPHONE OPPO (STUDI KASUS PADA MASYARAKAT KOTA BIMA),” vol. 14, no. 02, 2021, doi: 10.46306/jbbe.v14i2.

A. Murdapa, “Desain Produk sebagai Faktor Penentu dalam Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen,” Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 15(2), 123-135., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2020.

P. Kualitas Produk, E. Merek dan Gaya Hidup, N. Inten Suryani, and R. Lumban Batu, “YUME : Journal of Management,” YUME : Journal of Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 254–272, 2021, doi: 10.37531/yume.vxix.787.

“Rahayu Mardikaningsih 2021”.

A. Y. Zhafira and I. Rachmawati, “PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SMARTPHONE SAMSUNG DI KOTA BANDUNG Jurnal Mitra Manajemen (JMM Online),” Annisa Yasya Zhafira, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1287–1297, 2020.

A. Kurniawan and R. Dwijayanti, “PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK DAN KELOMPOK REFERENSI TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SEPEDA MEREK POLYGON PADA MASYARAKAT KABUPATEN GRESIK,” Jurnal Pendidikan Tata Niaga (JPTN), vol. 9, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.rodalink.com,

“PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK TERHADAP LOYALITAS PELANGGAN PADA MEMBER PRODUK NATURA WORLD BEAUTY DI KOTA TANJUNGPINANG SKRIPSI MEVIYOLA NIM : 19612077 SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU EKONOMI (STIE) PEMBANGUNAN TANJUNGPINANG 2023.”

R. J. Farhas, “Analisis Keputusan Pembelian Smartphone pada Gen-Z,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://jes-tm.org/

“Ferlita Yulia Jansen - PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK, CITRA MEREK, DAN KUALITAS PRODUK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN KONSUMEN SMARTPHONE SAMSUNG PADA MAHASISWA FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS UNSRAT 2019-2020”.

“Faigah A. Badjamal1, 2019”.

P. Kotler, Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2018.

J. Handayani, D. Deriawan, and T. W. Hendratni, “Pengaruh Desain Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian dan Dampaknya pada Kepuasan Konsumen,” Journal of Business and Banking, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 91, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.14414/jbb.v10i1.2261.

R. , S. E. , & P. D. Laksana, “Pengaruh desain produk terhadap keputusan pembelian: Analisis parsial,” Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2021.

A. Susanti et al., “PEMAHAMAN ADAPTIVE REUSE DALAM ARSITEKTUR DAN DESAIN INTERIOR SEBAGAI UPAYA MENJAGA KEBERLANJUTAN LINGKUNGAN: ANALISIS TINJAUAN LITERATUR,” Online. [Online]. Available: http://senada.std-bali.ac.id

“Wolff - PENGARUH GAYA HIDUP, HARGA, DAN CITRA MEREK TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PRODUK SMARTPHONE MEREK IPHONE PADA KAUM PEREMPUAN MILENIAL DI KECAMATAN TAHUNA”.

S. , R. Y. , & K. D. Triadi, “Pengaruh gaya hidup dan harga terhadap keputusan pembelian handphone,” Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 257–263, 2021.

G. Nurmalia, Mutiasari Nur Wulan, and Zathu Restie Utamie, “Gaya Hidup Berbasis Digital Dan Perilaku Konsumtif Pada Gen Z Di Bandar Lampung: Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Marketplace Shopee,” Jurnal Rekoginisi Ekonomi Islam, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 22–32, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.34001/jrei.v3i01.846.

“Maghfirah, 180602105, FEBI, ES”.

A. Fitria, “Pengaruh Brand Image Dan Gaya Hidup Hedonis Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Iphone Di Kota Surabaya,” SINOMIKA Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 965–980, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.54443/sinomika.v1i4.480.

G. Armstrong, Principles of Marketing. London: Pearson Education, 2023.

E. Purna Yudha, G. Zahira, and D. S. Gabero, “ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN DI SHOPEE ANALYSIS OF FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PURCHASING DECISIONS AT SHOPEE.”

P. Kotler and K. L. Keller, Marketing Management, 15th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2019.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2021.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

V. W. Sujerweni, Metodologi Penelitian:Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press, 2014.

M. Isman, H. Prasetyo, and D. Wulandari, “Pengaruh Desain Produk terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

PENGARUH EKUITAS MEREK, DESAIN PRODUK, DAN GAYA HIDUP TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PONSEL IPHONE PADA GENERASI MUDA DI KECAMATAN GAJAH, DEMAK. (2025). Dinamika: Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi, 5(1), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.51903/b1e8v118