BUILDING RESILIENCE THROUGH AI: PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE POST-COVID GLOBAL MARKET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/c44y6a86Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Supply Chain Resilience, Predictive AnalyticsAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed fundamental vulnerabilities in global supply chain systems, such as over-reliance on single suppliers and a lack of operational visibility. This has highlighted the urgent need for a new approach to risk management—one that leverages smart technologies. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising solution, thanks to its capabilities in predictive analytics and adaptive, data-driven decision-making in real time. This study aims to develop an AI-based predictive system framework to enhance the resilience of global supply chains in the face of post-pandemic disruptions. Using the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, the research designs and evaluates a system that integrates algorithms such as LSTM, Random Forest, Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Reinforcement Learning. It also applies a federated learning approach to ensure data privacy among supply chain partners. The study analyzes over 12,000 data entries from diverse sources, including IoT devices, weather data, demand trends, and social media. The system's effectiveness is evaluated through a combination of quantitative methods (PLS-SEM analysis on 103 respondents) and qualitative methods (interviews with 12 industry executives). The findings show that AI-driven predictive analytics significantly improve supply chain resilience (β = 0.67; p < 0.001), with demand forecasting accuracy increasing by up to 40% and delivery times reduced by 30%. Conceptually, the study contributes by designing a resilient model that integrates real-time visibility, adaptability, and cross-organizational collaborative learning. Unlike traditional approaches focused solely on automation, this framework offers a more holistic solution, addressing key gaps in the literature. The implication is clear: AI is becoming a strategic asset in building sustainable, resilient supply chains amid ongoing global uncertainty.
References
[1] S. M. Ali, A. U. Rahman, G. Kabir, and S. K. Paul, “Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Supply Chain Performance: Implications for Sustainability,” Sustain. , vol. 16, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16062373.
[2] D. Zhang, “AI integration in supply chain and operations management: Enhancing efficiency and resilience,” Appl. Comput. Eng., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2024, doi: 10.54254/2755-2721/90/2024melb0060.
[3] S. Khan, F. Zehra, and S. Khan, “Optimizing Organizational Agility : The Symbiotic Impact of AI-Enhanced Supply Chain Collaboration and Risk Management on Performance and Flexibility †,” pp. 1–7, 2024.
[4] D. Patil, “Artificial intelligence-driven supply chain optimization : Enhancing demand forecasting and cost reduction Artificial intelligence-driven supply chain optimization : Enhancing demand forecasting and cost reduction Dimple Patil,” no. November, 2024.
[5] Mark Lokanan, “Supply Chain Through Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence,” Sustain. Glob. Agric. Supply Chain, pp. 383–402, 2024, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-4330-2.ch016.
[6] M. Sharma, R. Antony, A. Sharma, and T. Daim, “Can smart supply chain bring agility and resilience for enhanced sustainable business performance?,” Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 501–555, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-09-2023-0381.
[7] G. Zheng and A. Brintrup, “An Analytics-Driven Approach to Enhancing Supply Chain Visibility with Graph Neural Networks and Federated Learning,” 2025.
[8] O. Sarioguz and E. Miser, “Integrating AI in financial risk management : Evaluating the effects of machine learning algorithms on predictive accuracy and regulatory compliance Integrating AI in financial risk management : Evaluating the effects of machine learning algorithms on pre,” no. November, 2024, doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2206.
[9] P. Madzík, L. Falát, L. Copuš, and K. Čarnogurský, Resilience in supply chain risk management in disruptive world: rerouting research directions during and after pandemic. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10479-024-06126-x.
[10] M. Nasseri, T. Falatouri, P. Brandtner, and F. Darbanian, “Applying Machine Learning in Retail Demand Prediction—A Comparison of Tree-Based Ensembles and Long Short-Term Memory-Based Deep Learning,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app131911112.
[11] L. Wang, Y. Cheng, A. Xiang, J. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Application of Natural Language Processing in Financial Risk Detection,” Financ. Eng. Risk Manag., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.23977/ferm.2024.070401.
[12] M. C. Camur, S. K. Ravi, and S. Saleh, “Enhancing supply chain resilience: A machine learning approach for predicting product availability dates under disruption,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 247, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123226.
[13] J. Zhao and Q. Li, “Mitigating distribution shift in machine learning-augmented hybrid simulation,” 2024, doi: 10.1137/23M1615425.
[14] A. Abbasi Kamardi, H. Amoozad Mahdiraji, S. Masoumi, and V. Jafari-Sadeghi, “Developing sustainable competitive advantages from the lens of resource-based view: evidence from IT sector of an emerging economy,” J. Strateg. Mark., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2022.2160485.
[15] F. Arndt, P. Galvin, R. J. G. Jansen, G. J. M. Lucas, and P. Su, “Dynamic capabilities: New ideas, microfoundations, and criticism,” J. Manag. Organ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 423–428, 2022, doi: 10.1017/jmo.2022.57.
[16] S. Marvaniya, J. Singh, N. Galichet, F. O. Otieno, G. de Mel, and K. Weldemariam, “Encoding Seasonal Climate Predictions With Modular Neural Network,” ICASSP, IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. - Proc., pp. 6105–6109, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10446114.
[17] E. William and D. Technologies, “Real-Time Supply Chain Visibility with AI and IoT,” no. February, 2025, doi: 10.1016/jsmr.2022.103215.
[18] J. Zhang, Y. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Enhancing Supply Chain Forecasting with Machine Learning : A Data-Driven Approach to Demand Prediction , Risk Management , and Demand-Supply Optimization,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.54254/3049-5768/2024.18321.
[19] B. Liu and Q. Tang, “Secure Data Sharing in Federated Learning through Blockchain-Based Aggregation,” Futur. Internet, vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16040133.
[20] V. Tandon, N. Asgari, and R. Ranganathan, “Divestment of relational assets following acquisitions: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1013–1052, 2022, doi: 10.1002/smj.3456.
[21] P. K. Dey, C. Malesios, S. Chowdhury, K. Saha, P. Budhwar, and D. De, “Adoption of circular economy practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Europe,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 248, no. February, p. 108496, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108496.
[22] O. G. Kayas, “Workplace surveillance: A systematic review, integrative framework, and research agenda,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 168, no. August, p. 114212, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114212.
[23] S. Krakowski, J. Luger, and S. Raisch, “Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1425–1452, 2023, doi: 10.1002/smj.3387.
[24] A. Walter, K. Ahsan, and S. Rahman, “Application of artificial intelligence in demand planning for supply chains: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 672–719, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-02-2024-0120.
[25] J. Füller, Z. Tekic, and K. Hutter, “Rethinking Innovation Management—How AI Is Changing the Way We Innovate,” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 2024, doi: 10.1177/00218863241287323.
[26] X. Zuo et al., “Federated TrustChain: Blockchain-Enhanced LLM Training and Unlearning,” vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–16, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dinamika: Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
