ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN PENGELOLAAN PIUTANG DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN TECHOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM)

Miftahurrohman; Leny  Isnaini; Robby Andika Kusumajaya

doi:10.51903/3aj1e857

Authors

Miftahurrohman Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer
Leny Isnaini Universitas Sains Dan Teknologi Komputer
Robby Andika Kusumajaya Universitas Sains Dan Teknologi Komputer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/3aj1e857

Keywords:

Accounts Receivable Management , Technology Acceptance Model, Smart-PLS

Abstract

Accounts receivable management for financial services organizations has a very strategic position, to minimize the risks of accounts receivable that can disrupt business operations. Implementation of an accounts receivable management information system is an effort made by organizations to minimize the impacts of accounts receivable losses. However, the success rate of system implementation is still relatively low and still expensive, so it is necessary to conduct an analysis of the implementation of an information system to determine the factors that influence user behavior in using the information system.

By using the technology accepted model (TAM) approach to identify factors that influence users in using the information system. The results of the study explain that the perception of user convenience does not affect the intention of information system users, attitudes towards using information system technology and actual use of technology. While the perception of usefulness has a significant influence on the perception of user convenience and the attitude of information system users. Other results of this study indicate that the attitude of using the information system affects the intention of information system users, and the intention of information system users affects the actual use of technology.

References

[1] I. L. Meriam, N. A. Achsani, and T. Novianti, “Receivable Management Performance Measurement Tool and Factors Affecting Account Receivable Performance,” vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1169–1177, 2017, doi: 10.21275/ART20177072.

[2] A. N. Saroinsong, “Fungsi Bank Dalam Sistem Penyaluran Kredit Perbankan,” JLex Priv., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 130–137, 2014.

[3] R. R. Rompas, I. Elim, and I. G. Suwetja, “Analisis Pengelolaan Piutang Dan Kerugian Piutang Tak Tertagih Pada Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang,” Going Concern J. Ris. Akunt., vol. 13, no. 04, pp. 285–293, 2018, doi: 10.32400/gc.13.03.20172.2018.

[4] L. Smrcka and D. Camska, “Receivables Management and Possible Use of Information Technologies,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag., vol. 1, no. 3, 2016, doi: 10.20897/lectito.201632.

[5] P. B. S. Dan, “Account Receivable Management and Corporate Performances: An empirical evidence from quoted manufacturing companies in Nigeria,” Inors Arts Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 116–129, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://www.inosr.net/inosr-arts-and-management/.

[6] I. Patuan and A. A. Hermawan, “The Effect Of Internal Control On The Receivables Management,” Int. J. Contemp. Account., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 61–80, 2023.

[7] Abdul Latif and Y. Van Solang, “Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Pengelolaan Piutang Pada Amanah Finance Cabang Gorontalo,” J. Stud. Ekon. dan Bisnis Islam, vol. I, no. 2, pp. 14–25, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/lifalah/article/view/486/475%0A.

[8] E. Mbarushimana and O. Kengere, “Accounts Receivable Management Practices and Financial Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Rwanda ; A Case Study of CIMERWA Plc,” J. Financ. Account., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 21–44, 2023.

[9] A. Siekelova, T. Kliestik, L. Svabova, A. Androniceanu, and J. Schönfeld, “Zarządzanie wierzytelnościami: Znaczenie wskaźników finansowych w ocenie zdolności kredytowej,” Polish J. Manag. Stud., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 217–228, 2017, doi: 10.17512/pjms.2017.15.2.20.

[10] C. N. Joseph, “Analisis pengaruh kebijakan pengelolaan piutang terhadap profitabilitas pada koperasi unit desa unatisa di desa allang,” Cita Ekon. J. Ekon., vol. XI, no. 1, pp. 63–68, 2017.

[11] G. O. Owuor, N. Agusioma, and F. Wafula, “Effect of Accounts Receivable Management on Financial Performance of Chartered Public Universities in Kenya,” Int. J. Curr. Asp. Financ. Bank. Account., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2021, doi: 10.35942/ijcfa.v3i1.182.

[12] Khairudin, I. A. Alam, and K. S. Pangestu, “Analisis Strategi Pengelolaan Piutang Dalam Meminimalisir Piutang Macet Pada Pt Pln (Persero) Up3 Tanjung Karang,” Deriv. J. Manaj., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 247–254, 2022.

[13] T. Wahyudi, K. Dwi Astuti, and I. Putri Kinasih, “Accounts Receivable Information System at PT. Latinusa, Tbk,” J. Appl. Business, Tax. Econ. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 401–409, 2022, doi: 10.54408/jabter.v1i4.82.

[14] A. Zhillan Sabtina Syawali, A. Syahadat Harahap, H. Aditya Pradesa, and F. Aditya Tri Andikaputra, “Analisis Penggunaan Aplikasi BJB DIGI Mobile Banking dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 624–633, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i1.1205.

[15] P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.

[16] Y. Lee, K. A. Kozar, and K. R. T. Larsen, “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. December, 2003, doi: 10.17705/1cais.01250.

[17] Z. Zufiyardi, Y. Yusmaniarti, F. Fraternesi, and A. Ibrahim, “Mengukur Niat Penggunakan Aplikasi Akuntansi Dengan Pendekatan Theory Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” J. Akuntansi, Keuang. Dan Teknol. Inf. Akunt., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 341–369, 2022, doi: 10.36085/jakta.v2i2.2805.

[18] D. N. Zebua, M. M. Bate’e, and Y. N. Telaumbanua, “Analisis Manajemen Piutang dalam Meminimalisir Resiko Piutang Tak Tertagih pada PT. Multi Pilar Indah Jaya (Distributor PT. Uniliver Indonesia Tbk) Kota Gunungsitoli,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1259–1268, 2022.

[19] A. Siekelova, T. Kliestik, L. Svabova, A. Androniceanu, and J. Schönfeld, “RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT : THE IMPORTANCE OF FINANCIAL INDICATORS IN ASSESSING,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 217–228, 2017, doi: 10.17512/pjms.2017.15.2.20.

[20] Y. Dwi, Y. Anugrah, Z. Rosida, and R. Fadilah, “Penerapan Manajemen Kas , Manajemen Piutang Dan Manajemen Persediaan Dalam Laporan Keuangan,” Muhasabatuna-Jurnal Akunt. dan Keuang. Islam, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 27–32, 2021.

[21] M. R. Anggraeni, J. Sudiman, and L. A. Herman, “Analisis Manajemen Piutang Untuk Meminimalkan Risiko Piutang Tak Tertagih Pada Organisasi INKINDO Sumatera Barat,” Akunt. dan Manaj., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2023.

[22] S. W. Azizah, “Pengaruh Manajemen Persediaan dan Manajemen Piutang Terhadap Modal Kerja Perusahaan ( Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di BEI ),” J. Pendidik. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 61–70, 2017.

[23] J. Firnanti, H. Ispriyahadi, and E. C. Sembiring, “Analisis pengaruh struktur aktiva , manajemen hutang , dan manajemen piutang terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan,” Fair ValueJurnal Ilm. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 4767–4781, 2022.

[24] R. Triana, H. Sulistiani, and Neneng, “SISTEM INFORMASI AKUNTANSI PENGELOLAAN PIUTANG USAHA UNTUK MENYAJIKAN PERNYATAAN PIUTANG ( OPEN ITEM STATEMENT ) PADA PT CHANDRA PUTRA GLOBALINDO,” J. TEKNOKOMPAK, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 34–38, 2018.

[25] S. A. Lukianova, “ORGANIZATION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE IN THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Stud.,” Економіка інноваційної діяльності підприємств, pp. 67–68.

[26] E. Nurbaeti, S. Hambani, A. Jamaludin Aziz, and S. Anwar, “Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dan Pengendalian Internal : Kajian Pada Efektivitas Pengelolaan Piutang,” J. Akunida, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2023, doi: 10.30997/jakd.v9i2.10329.

[27] S.-C. Chen, S.-H. Li, and C.-Y. Li, “RECENT RELATED RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: A LITERATURE REVIEW,” Aust. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 124–127, 2011.

[28] H. O. Awa, O. Ukoha, and B. C. Emecheta, “Integrating TAM and TOE Frameworks and Expanding their Characteristic Constructs for E-Commerce Adoption by SMEs,” 2012, pp. 571–588, doi: 10.28945/1676.

[29] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2017.

[30] P. W. Utami and A. R. Tanaamah, “Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Administrasi Desa (SMARD) Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” in Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Indonesia (Sesindo) 9, 2017, no. November.

[31] T. Prihatin, A. Muhammad, and T. Hidayat, “Evaluasi Keberhasilan Implementasi Sistem Informasi Pelayanan Publik Menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. Dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 13, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i3.1420.