Pendekatan Literasi Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Kesiapan Belajar Siswa di Daerah Pedesaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51903/j6xpmr85Keywords:
Literasi Digital, Kesiapan Belajar, Siswa Desa, Kesenjangan Digital, Quasi-EksperimenAbstract
Transformasi digital menuntut literasi digital, tetapi siswa desa masih terkendala akses dan pendampingan sehingga kesiapan belajar rendah. Penelitian ini menerapkan pendekatan literasi digital kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kesiapan belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Metode yang digunakan adalah kuasi-eksperimen dengan desain one-group pretest-posttest pada 30-60 responden yang dipilih secara purposif. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, observasi, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji paired sample t-test dan N-Gain. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada literasi digital (58,4 menjadi 78,9) dan kesiapan belajar (60,2 menjadi 80,7) dengan kategori peningkatan sedang. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pelatihan berbasis praktik dan pendampingan efektif dalam memperkuat kemampuan digital dan kesiapan belajar. Penelitian ini menawarkan model literasi digital yang adaptif terhadap kondisi lokal sebagai upaya mengurangi kesenjangan digital dan mendukung pembelajaran berbasis teknologi di wilayah pedesaan.
References
[1] Aquino et al., “Impact of digital transformation : assessing the knowledge and adoption of disruptive technologies in a higher education institution,” no. July, 2025.
[2] Trixa et al., “Information literacy in the digital age : information sources , evaluation strategies , and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers,” no. March, pp. 1–22, 2024.
[3] E. Kormos, “A quantitative analysis of rural teacher readiness for the digital divide,” pp. 1–17, 2026.
[4] Wahid et al., “Persepsi Guru pada Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2022.
[5] Moreno & Rincon, “Digital divide as an explanatory variable for dropout in higher education,” vol. 0, 2025.
[6] Loi et al., “Exploring University Students ’ Online Learning Readiness : A Mixed Methods Study of Forced Online Learning,” vol. 10, no. 1, 2024.
[7] Yuan et al., “The impact of digital literacy on learning outcomes among college students : the mediating effect of digital atmosphere , self-efficacy for digital technology and digital learning,” no. August, pp. 1–11, 2025.
[8] Getenet et al., “Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, 2024.
[9] Lin et al., “What are the determinants of rural-urban divide in teachers’ digital teaching competence? Empirical evidence from a large sample,” no. 2023, 2023.
[10] Kaawa-mafigiri et al., “Research and community engagement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting : a mixed methods study with epidemic preparedness implications,” 2025.
[11] Alanoglu et al., “Understanding university students ’ self ‑ directed online learning in the context of emergency remote teaching : the role of online learning readiness and digital literacy,” J. Comput. High. Educ., no. 0123456789, 2025.
[12] Maharjan et al., “Participatory learning : Exploring place-based pedagogy for future teachers,” vol. 9, no. 4, 2024.
[13] Jogdand et al., “Exploring Sample Size Determination in Educational Research : A Comprehensive Review [ version 3 ; peer review : 1 approved , 3 not approved ],” no. May, pp. 1–22, 2024.
[14] Neupane et al., “Data collection methods in qualitative research : researchers ’ reflections,” 2026.
[15] P. Dorsah, “The Use of Cronbach ’ s Alpha Reliability in Educational Research : A Systematic Review,” 2026.
[16] Christman et al., “Beyond normalized gain : Improved comparison of physics educational outcomes,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 10123, 2024.
[17] Buchan et al., “Navigating the digital world : development of an evidence ‑ based digital literacy program and assessment tool for youth,” Smart Learn. Environ., 2024.
[18] Rosales-Marquez et al., “Self-confidence as a predictor of digital skills : a fundamental pillar for the digitalization of higher education,” 2021.
[19] Ayub et al., “Effects of a long term faculty development program on improvement in quality of MCQs : an impact evaluation study,” 2025.
[20] Haerawan et al., “The Effectiveness of Interactive Videos in Increasing Student Engagement in Online Learning,” vol. 2, no. October, pp. 244–258, 2024.
[21] Yuan et al., “Digital literacy as a catalyst for academic confidence : exploring the interplay between academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination among medical students,” 2024.
[22] Setyadi et al., “Risk management , digital technology literacy , and modern learning environments in enhancing learning innovation performance : A framework for higher education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 15095–15123, 2025.
[23] Goutama et al., “THE EFFECT OF STUDENT ’ S DIGITAL LITERACY AND SELF - EFFICACY ON STUDENTS LEARNING INDEPENDENCE WITH,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2023.
[24] Zhou et al., “Bridging the digital divide : how does rural digitalization promote rural common prosperity ?,” no. June, pp. 1–23, 2025.
[25] Zakir et al., “Digital literacy and academic performance : the mediating roles of digital informal learning , self-efficacy , and students ’ digital competence,” no. June, pp. 1–13, 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dewi Widyaningsih, Olivia Sindi Sapan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
