Edukasi Perlindungan Data Biometrik melalui Pengenalan YOLOv12 dan FastSAM bagi Mahasiswa

Authors

  • Kahfi Heryandi Suradiradja Program Studi Magister Teknik Informatika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0732-2913
  • Teguh Raharjo Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Program Sarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8728-1069
  • Vergina Sawmitha Adompo Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Program Sarjana, Universitas Pamulang, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/tf9am422

Keywords:

data biometrik, pengabdian masyarakat, pengenalan wajah, YOLOv12, FastSAM, liveness

Abstract

Face recognition requires an understanding of application functions and biometric data risks. This community service program at STIE Hidayatullah Depok aimed to support students’ biometric literacy and identify further educational needs. The activity took place on October 11, 2026, from 08:00 to 13:00 Western Indonesian Time through presentations and discussion. Evaluation covered 19 pre-test and 17 post-test responses, each containing five questions worth 20 points, with 15 matched respondents. Analysis comprised score verification, descriptive statistics, and item-level response accuracy. Mean scores were 89.47 ± 18.10 and 77.65 ± 19.85, respectively, and were reported separately because the instruments assessed different content. Post-test accuracy reached 100.00% for unknown-label interpretation, 94.12% for FastSAM, 76.47% for embeddings, 64.71% for YOLOv12, and 52.94% for liveness. Four of the 12 responses scoring 80–100 still answered the liveness question incorrectly. These findings provide a basis for prioritizing content for students at the partner institution. Assessable outcomes are limited to item-level knowledge and identified learning needs. Knowledge improvement, behavioral change, and practical skills cannot yet be established. Proposed follow-up focuses on liveness and detection functions, supported by equivalent instruments for future evaluation.

References

[1] D. Long and B. Magerko, “What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–16, doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376727.

[2] D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, “Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Art. no. 100041, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

[3] M. C. Laupichler, A. Aster, J. Schirch, and T. Raupach, “Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, Art. no. 100101, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101.

[4] Y. Tian, Q. Ye, and D. Doermann, “YOLOv12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 38, 2025, doi: 10.52202/085713-2627.

[5] X. Zhao, W. Ding, Y. An, Y. Du, T. Yu, M. Li, M. Tang, and J. Wang, “Fast segment anything,” arXiv:2306.12156, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.12156.

[6] J. Deng, J. Guo, J. Yang, N. Xue, I. Kotsia, and S. Zafeiriou, “ArcFace: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 5962–5979, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3087709.

[7] Z. Yu, Y. Qin, X. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Lei, and G. Zhao, “Deep learning for face anti-spoofing: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 5609–5631, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3215850.

[8] J. Buolamwini and T. Gebru, “Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification,” in Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81, 2018, pp. 77–91. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

[9] H. Suresh and J. Guttag, “A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning life cycle,” in Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3465416.3483305.

[10] J. M. Nissen, R. M. Talbot, A. N. Thompson, and B. Van Dusen, “Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 010115, 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Edukasi Perlindungan Data Biometrik melalui Pengenalan YOLOv12 dan FastSAM bagi Mahasiswa. (2026). Community : Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 6(3), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.51903/tf9am422