Apresiasi Desainer di Industri Percetakan: Review tentang Faktor Ekonomi, Literasi, dan Digitalisasi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/dwtg8529

Keywords:

apresiasi profesi, jasa desain, industri kreatif, literature review, desain visual

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masih terbatasnya kajian sistematis mengenai faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi apresiasi terhadap profesi desain grafis di industri kreatif, khususnya sektor percetakan. Penelitian bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang membentuk apresiasi terhadap profesi desain grafis melalui metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berdasarkan pedoman PRISMA. Literatur diperoleh dari Scopus, Google Scholar, Garuda, dan ScienceDirect pada periode 2010–2025. Sebanyak 25 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dianalisis menggunakan sintesis tematik. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi lima tema utama, yaitu faktor ekonomi, pendidikan dan literasi visual, sosiokultural, teknologi dan digitalisasi, serta regulasi dan kelembagaan. Analisis menunjukkan keterkaitan yang kompleks antar faktor, dengan literasi visual dan digitalisasi berperan sebagai variabel paradoksal yang dapat membentuk low-appreciation trap. Temuan utama menegaskan bahwa pendidikan merupakan faktor strategis yang memengaruhi seluruh dimensi apresiasi melalui pengembangan kurikulum, penguatan pedagogi literasi visual, dan program community learning. Tanpa pendidikan yang sistematis dan berkelanjutan, upaya peningkatan apresiasi melalui pendekatan ekonomi, teknologi, maupun regulasi akan menghadapi hambatan struktural. Oleh karena itu, pendidikan perlu ditempatkan sebagai fondasi utama dalam strategi peningkatan apresiasi profesi desain grafis.

References

Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in the Creative Industries: A Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 589–656. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7

Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2020). Visual Literacy Theory: Moving from the Periphery to the Mainstream. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39(3-4), 149–165.

Banks, M. (2010). Creative Justice: Cultural Industries, Work and Inequality. London: outledge.

Brumberger, E. (2024). Visual Communication Design Students’ Self-Perception of Their Visual Literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 43(4), 245–262. doi: 10.1080/1051144x.2024.2394331

Chapain, C., & Stachowiak, K. (2015). A Case for Channelling Creative Industries Into a Viable Industry Sub-Sector. Creative Industries Journal, 8(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/ 17510694.2015.1048066

Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., & Verganti, R. (2020). Design Value in the AI Era: Understanding How Firms Capture Returns From Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(6), 492–510. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12548

Febrianto, A., & Nugroho, S. (2020). Batik Anomart Media Arts Education Creativity and Appreciation: Case Study in Creative Industry. JADECS (Journal of Art, Design, Art Education and Culture Studies), 5(1), 1–7. doi: 10.17977/um034v5i1p1-7

Florida, R. (2002). The Economic Geography of Talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743–755. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00314

Gill, R. (2023). How being creative became precarious. In a Research Agenda for Creative Industries (pp. 17–35). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4324/9781003162025-2

Go, E. M., & Mothelsang, K. (2024). Trends in Modern Typography Design: Visual Preferences on E-Commerce Platforms. International Journal of Graphic Design, 2(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.51903/IJGD.V2I2.2147

Hewison, R. (2015). Cultural Policy and the Creative Industries. London: Routledge. Liu, T., & Santoso, B.(2022).Design thinking: innovation approaches and challenges toward product development.CRC Press Book Chapter.doi: 10.1201/9781003189923-5

Maudet, N. (2025). Design Templates: Between Empowerment And Control Of Amateurgraphic Designers. Design Issues, 41(1), 38–50.

Maulana, R., & Hidayat, F. (2022). Sikap bahasa desainer grafis di kota Banjarmasin terhadap bahasa indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajarannya, 12(2), 117–130. doi: 10.20527/jbsp.v12i2.11772

Fadhlan Ramdhani, A. W., & Susanti, A. (2023). Pemanfaatan teknologi OpenAI DALL-E 2 dalam meningkatkan kreativitas desainer grafis pada komunitas desain grafisIndonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Komunikasi Digital, 1(2), 1–12.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Moultrie, J., Livesey, F., Malvido, A., & Riedel, J. (2015). Understanding and measuring the value of design. Design Management Review, 26(1), 32–39. doi: 10.1111/ drev.10312

Oakley, K., & O’Connor, J. (2015). Cultural work and creative industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Khumair, M., & Yazid, M. (2025). Analisis peran ekonomi kreatif dalam pemberdayaanmasyarakat lokal: studi literatur kualitatif terhadap perkembangan industri kreatif diIndonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia, 3(3), 156–169.

Pratt, A. C. (2023). Creative industries and development: culture in development, or the cultures of development? City, Culture and Society, 32, 100489. doi: 10.1016/ j.ccs.2022.100489

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Laksono, M. A., & Kautsar, I. A. (2024). Implementation of payment gateway on digitalfreelance platform using REST. UINSA Press (Preprint), 4, 1–15.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Towse, R. (2010). The economics of creativity and creative industries. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(2), 77–92.

Wahid, A., & Susilawati, E. (2020). Apakah pembelajaran menggunakan teknologi dapat meningkatkan literasi manusia pada era revolusi industri 4.0? Jurnal Manajemen Informatika (JAMIKA), 10(1), 45–58. doi: 10.34010/jamika.v10i1.2678

Wheeler, A. (2018). Designing brand identity: An essential guide for the whole branding team (5th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1177/0950017018785616

Zen, A., Mirza, I. M. M., Razak, M., & Soebandi, A. (2025). Legal Protection of Copyright on Creative Industrial Work Made by Artificial Intelligence. KnE Social Sciences, 10(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i3.17908

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): JULI : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan (EDUCATION)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Fitro Nur Hakim, Setiyo Prihatmoko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All articles published in this journal are open access and licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Under this license:

  • Authors retain copyright of their work.

  • Others are free to:

    • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;

    • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially;

  • As long as they:

    • Give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source;

    • Provide a link to the license;

    • Indicate if changes were made;

    • Distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.

This ensures that derivative works will also remain free and open under the same terms.

How to Cite

Apresiasi Desainer di Industri Percetakan: Review tentang Faktor Ekonomi, Literasi, dan Digitalisasi. (2026). Education : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.51903/dwtg8529