The Impact of Social Media Activism on Equity-Focused Educational Reform Movements

Authors

  • Arna Almaidah Saputri Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia
  • Lailatul Fitriyah Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia
  • Candra Yuniantika Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia
  • Esa Lisani Rohima Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51903/vn18wg75

Keywords:

Social Media Activism, Educational Equity, Framing Strategy, Policy Discourse, Digital Advocacy

Abstract

Social media has become largely a place for educational activism and debate, particularly in promoting equity-driven reforms. Twitter and TikTok are used intensively by online communities to highlight educational inequities and influence public perception. This study aims to uncover how social media activism, through specific framing tactics, leads to policy debate and institutional response in the face of equitable education reform. A single qualitative case study was conducted through the analysis of 120 TikTok clips, 87 Twitter threads, and 12 semi-structured interviews with digital education activists. NVivo was utilized for thematic analysis to ascertain framing strategies that are most prevalent and issue clusters. The findings suggest that TikTok primarily uses motivational framing to establish emotional engagement, while Twitter uses diagnostic and prognostic framing to define structural problems and propose policy remedies. Three-level framing (diagnostic, prognostic, motivational) was found to be the most effective way of mobilizing public engagement and provoking institutional response.Five issues rooted in necessities available on platforms are inequity of access, curricular bias, minority underrepresentation, symbolic violence in schools, and the invisibility of the budget. The study adds to the theory of framing by placing the deployment of its conceptualisation in digital education activism and has practical implications for educators, policymakers, and civil society actors to build educational equity through participatory digital platforms.

References

Abdulla, R. (2023). Social Media, the Public Sphere, and Public Space in Authoritarian Settings: A Case Study of Egypt’s Tahrir Square and 18 Years of User Generated Content. Social Media and Society, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231158824

Chen, B., Lukito, J., & Koo, G. H. (2023). Comparing the #StopTheSteal Movement across Multiple Platforms: Differentiating Discourse on Facebook, Twitter, and Parler. Social Media and Society, 9(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196879

Delmonaco, D., Mayworm, S., Thach, H., Guberman, J., Augusta, A., & Haimson, O. L. (2024). “What are you doing, TikTok?” : How Marginalized Social Media Users Perceive, Theorize, and “Prove” Shadowbanning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637431

Diepeveen, S., & Pinet, M. (2022). User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation. Development Policy Review, 40(S2), e12671. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12671

Eriksson Krutrök, M., & Åkerlund, M. (2022). Through a white lens: Black victimhood, visibility, and whiteness in the Black Lives Matter movement on TikTok. Information Communication and Society, 26(10), 1996–2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2065211

Frenette, A., Millette, M., & Desbiens, C. (2024). Out With the Hero: How TikTok Everyday Stories Are Re-writing the Arctic. Social Media and Society, 10(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241283426

Gerbaudo, P. (2024). From individual affectedness to collective identity: personal testimony campaigns on social media and the logic of collection. New Media and Society, 26(8), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221128523

Gritsenko, D., & Wood, M. (2022). Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach. Regulation and Governance, 16(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12367

Harris, C., Johnson, A. G., Palmer, S., Yang, D., & Bruckman, A. (2023). “Honestly, I Think TikTok has a Vendetta Against Black Creators”: Understanding Black Content Creator Experiences on TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610169

Hawkins, D. S. (2023). “When you Search a #Hashtag, it Feels Like You’re Searching for Death:” Black Twitter and Communication About Police Brutality Within the Black Community. Social Media and Society, 9(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231179705

Jalli, N. (2025). Viral Justice: TikTok Activism, Misinformation, and the Fight for Social Change in Southeast Asia. Social Media and Society, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251318122

Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic Resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476046

Kermani, H., & Adham, M. (2021). Mapping Persian Twitter: Networks and mechanism of political communication in Iranian 2017 presidential election. Big Data and Society, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211025568

Li, Y., Bernard, J. G., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2021). Beyond Clicktivism: What Makes Digitally Native Activism Effective? An Exploration of the Sleeping Giants Movement. Social Media and Society, 7(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035357

Luo, Y., & Fang, K. (2024). Transnational Citizen Journalism for Resistance and Solidarity: The Case of a Sinophone Community on Instagram. International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241291812

MacKinnon, K. R., Kia, H., & Lacombe-Duncan, A. (2021). Examining TikTok’s Potential for Community-Engaged Digital Knowledge Mobilization with Equity-Seeking Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e30315. https://doi.org/10.2196/30315

Marino, S. (2024). Refugees’ Storytelling Strategies on Digital Media Platforms: How the Russia–Ukraine War Unfolded on TikTok. Social Media and Society, 10(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241279248

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Appolloni, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2023). Foundations and knowledge clusters in TikTok (Douyin) research: evidence from bibliometric and topic modelling analyses. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83, 32213–32243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16768-x

Sadler, O. (2022). Defiant Amplification or Decontextualized Commercialization? Protest Music, TikTok, and Social Movements. Social Media and Society, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221094769

Sarısakaloğlu, A. (2025). Navigating the Research Landscape of Algorithm-Driven Journalism: A Systematic Literature Review of Authorship, Research Trends, and Future Research Pathways. Journalism Studies, 26(5), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2446326

Sipocz, D., Freeman, J. D., & Elton, J. (2021). “A Toxic Trend?”: Generational Conflict and Connectivity in Twitter Discourse Under the #BoomerRemover Hashtag. The Gerontologist, 61(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa177

Smit, A., Swart, J., & Broersma, M. (2024). Bypassing digital literacy: Marginalized citizens’ tactics for participation and inclusion in digital societies. New Media and Society, 27(6), 3127–3145. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231220383

Sun, S., Liu, Z., Zhai, Y., & Wang, F. (2022). COVID-19 Vaccines on TikTok: A Big-Data Analysis of Entangled Discourses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013287

Tahamtan, I., Potnis, D., Mohammadi, E., Miller, L. E., & Singh, V. (2021). Framing of and attention to covid-19 on twitter: Thematic analysis of hashtags. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e30800. https://doi.org/10.2196/30800

Vrikki, P., & Lekakis, E. (2024). Digital consumers and platform workers unite and fight? The platformisation of consumer activism in the case of #cancel_efood in Greece. Marketing Theory, 24(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931231195191

Wang, Y., & Navarro Nicoletti, F. (2023). Entertainment Education and Citizens’ Participation in COVID-19 Pandemic Response: A Case Study of Chinese Citizens on Social Media. Social Sciences, 12(10), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100535

Zhao, X., & Abidin, C. (2023). The “Fox Eye” Challenge Trend: Anti-Racism Work, Platform Affordances, and the Vernacular of Gesticular Activism on TikTok. Social Media and Society, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157590

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): MARET : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan (EDUCATION)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Arna Almaidah Saputri, Lailatul Fitriyah, Candra Yuniantika, Esa Lisani Rohima

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All articles published in EDUCATION: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Authors retain copyright while granting the journal the right of first publication. Readers may freely share, distribute, and adapt published works, provided appropriate attribution is given and derivative works are distributed under the same license.

How to Cite

The Impact of Social Media Activism on Equity-Focused Educational Reform Movements. (2026). Education : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 6(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.51903/vn18wg75